Are full frontal naked photograhps of a 13 year old girl, in an Art Gallery "Pornographic" or "Art" ? Why ? - full frontal kates playground
In Australia, a large part of the community by the decision of the High Court to 76 full frontal nudity pictures of the year, 13 take ill as "art" and not "pornography".
What makes the difference? Even our Prime Minister Kevin Rudd PM, said the images "revolting" and therefore "Artist" Bill Henson to the right people were not able to properly find the image disgusting, why so many people supposedly privalidged or "Arty types" above the law?
Friday, February 5, 2010
Full Frontal Kates Playground Are Full Frontal Naked Photograhps Of A 13 Year Old Girl, In An Art Gallery "Pornographic" Or "Art" ? Why ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
This question was obviously from the perspective of the "write honest", it seems so self-righteous. The picture is not pornographic in the same way art nude photography 60 years ago is not pornographic.
The response of society is both justified and unjustified. Our society is very sensitive to the issue of child abuse, if this kind of art is not allowed in our time. And yet the people are not able to separate a sense of perspective and what is a social problem of our time who have a form of art history. In a sense, it is important that Henson created this art, because it made many people think they know why I did not. Unfortunately, most people had good responses with a genuine criticism, why this type of material, this traditional art form, is the origin of this type of reaction in Australia. His comments on the artists' above the law "does not take into account the motivation of why people create art. They showed a lack of critical thinking, because they do not even ask why Prime Minister would call "bad." We can say that this is a Christian who is usually the Philistines on art, but also because it is a political agenda - the host Australian population. And since most people are pretty stupid anyway be connected to the common denominator of opinion.
The fact that 70 people were arrested yesterday on child pornography in Australia gives you an idea of the level of "interest" in sexualizing children. Henson may actually have seen his work of art (ie, not sexually, they were inspired by children and photography of the game), but you can use your boots pedophiles in line to see this exposure. Therefore, we agree that should be closed.
ART The human body is beautiful
Add beauty and innocence, together have to agree for the Arts and Australian police.
Rudd had not seen the photos, when he signed his statement that it was widespread.
Remember Chloe in Melbourne a picture of a young girl of 16 years, hangs in the bar? Now it is a great work, which was almost destroyed by stupid people, the same people who put a fig leaf of David
I intend to buy copies
Nude photos of people has always been controversial or illustration. For me, I believe in freedom of expression and respect
Post a Comment